Comments on: Ursack Ultralight Backpacking Bear Bag review http://lightbackpacking.com/2006/07/24/ursack-bear-bag-review/ Ideas, advice, news and reviews, to help you become "one with your pack" Tue, 27 Sep 2011 21:38:10 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4 By: Jim X. http://lightbackpacking.com/2006/07/24/ursack-bear-bag-review/comment-page-1/#comment-1918 Jim X. Tue, 10 Jul 2007 16:43:58 +0000 http://lightbackpacking.com/2006/07/24/ursack-bear-bag-review/#comment-1918 I'm new to backpacking. Have done years of car camping. I purchased a Ursack V-21 hybrid, back in May 2006.In approximately August of '06 the "conditional approval" was withdrawn. I got one use out of this bag. This bag is a good idea, however, Ursak has been seeking approval in the restricted areas of the National Parks and Forests in the Sierra: Yosemite, SEKI, Inyo, Devil's Postpile, and Stanislaus since 2000! I now have a container that is illegal in the areas of primary intended use. Only buy the Ursack if you can afford the financial loss in case "Conditional Approval" is revoked. Bear in mind that they have gone through different iterations since year 2000, and final approval has not been given. I’m new to backpacking. Have done years of car camping. I purchased a Ursack V-21 hybrid, back in May 2006.In approximately August of ’06 the “conditional approval” was withdrawn.

I got one use out of this bag. This bag is a good idea, however, Ursak has been seeking approval in the restricted areas of the National Parks and Forests in the Sierra: Yosemite, SEKI, Inyo, Devil’s Postpile, and Stanislaus since 2000! I now have a container that is illegal in the areas of primary intended use.

Only buy the Ursack if you can afford the financial loss in case “Conditional Approval” is revoked.

Bear in mind that they have gone through different iterations since year 2000, and final approval has not been given.

]]>